![]() You might even be better off with an online Markdown editor that runs in the browser. Not all editors support every feature, so the trick is to find the one that does what you need. There’s a rich landscape of Mac options, and the best choice for me may not be the best choice for you. Advanced formatting, including tables and mathematical expressions.Some editors have an iOS version so you can keep working while you’re on the move. A document library to organize your content and sync between devices.Features that appeal to writers, including word count, readability scores, and versions.A distraction-free mode that takes advantage of features like full-screen editing, dark mode and typewriter mode.Some Markdown editors can publish directly to WordPress, Medium and more. Export and conversion features that easily transform your document from Markdown to HTML, PDF, DOCX or a number of other formats.Familiar keyboard shortcuts, like command + B for bold.Syntax highlighting and a preview pane to show you how your final document will look.Here are some features you might expect to find in your favorite Markdown editor: But using an editor designed for writing in Markdown has a lot of advantages, depending on your needs. It’s now also used in a wide variety of applications, as we’ll explore below.īecause Markdown is just plain text, you can create it with any text editor. It’s certainly an easy and efficient way to create online content, and has a number of benefits for writers and bloggers. Maybee ascii would interest you, similar plain-text formatting like md but more full featured.The syntax was created by John Gruber way back in 2004 and became popular in blogs and forums. I've been considering trying out an asciidoc -> docbook -> (latex -> pdf or straight docbook to html) workflow. I've really been liking LyX for the past years, but it might be a bit much for your typical high school student. I don't mean to bash or disrepect, just genuinely curious if you'd considered this or you had specific reasons for switching to markdown. If this were word '97 we were talking about, I'd understand, but modern Word is a quite powerful tool. Those are just OTOH features I'd consider important for writing a high school history report or whatever. * Also automatic numbering and referencing of tables, figures, etc. ![]() * Word has tools for managing references and bibliography generation ![]() ![]() Paginating naively from html (ie printing from a browser) makes ugly documents. * Html rendering has no concept of pagination. Word is far from my favorite document preparation system (let's call it that), but it still has many advantages over markdown, Word is very much for paper-oriented documents while md/html are for screen-first. What? Why? Word and md/html solve quite different problems, the way I see it. Previews are a little like fuzzy post-deploy tests for typos, poor phrasing, and syntax errors. URLs, footnotes, and the big bad, tables of content, are the kind of set-and-forget stuff you'd probably rather prefer in a separate document or something.īut it's also worth keeping in mind that people use Markdown for very different things, and those who aren't writing extensive READMEs with tables, links, and a bunch of headers won't run into those problems I love using Markdowns on forums, for instance, but I don't actually read those comments the same way I would an article or a README. Especially link syntax can hurt readability, even if you use variables instead of the full (http) url previews trim that away, although I'm slowly become broken inside enough to find Markdown tables easier to read than HTML renderings. Headers, tables, headers, blockquotes, code blocks, links, and footnotes can make text hard to read. I think the intent of Markdown is more the plain syntax and non-programmer look of it than the readability. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |